Michelle Kennedy

See how we've assessed them for all policy statements included in the Build a Ballot tool. Want to suggest a revision? Send us an email at tool@buildaballot.org.au

Policy

Evidence of support

Support level

Policy

Budget management

Give the anti-corruption commission more funding and powers

Policy details

This policy would increase funding and extend the investigative powers of Victoria’s Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC), which investigates public-sector corruption and police misconduct. (Source) This policy would provide additional funding beyond the September 2026 reforms now allow IBAC to investigate serious misconduct beyond criminal offences and trace public money through private contractors and subcontractors. (Source) IBAC investigates serious corruption, including the misuse of public money, (Source) so giving it more funding is intended to help save public funds over time.

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œIf elected, I’d work across Parliament to strengthen IBAC's independence and ensure it has the resources to do its job effectively. I support stable, multi-year funding, independently assessed, with governments required to publicly explain any difference between what IBAC requests and what it receives. Recent funding increases are welcome, but we need to ensure resources keep pace with IBAC's expanded responsibilities.

IBAC's new powers to investigate suspected corruption involving public funds and government contractors are an important step forward. I'd support parliamentary scrutiny of how effectively these powers are working and consider further reforms allowing IBAC to hold public inquiries into systemic corruption risks, with appropriate safeguards for witnesses, privacy, and procedural fairness.

I also want greater transparency around public spending. Victorians should be able to see who receives major government contracts, what outcomes were promised and what has actually been delivered, while respecting legitimate confidentiality requirements. Governments should publicly respond to IBAC recommendations and report on their progress.

Accountability must apply to everyone, including me. I'd explain my parliamentary votes, disclose relevant interests and meetings, and report regularly to the people of Ivanhoe. Public office is a responsibility to the community, not a privilege that puts anyone above scrutiny.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Budget management

Significantly reduce the size of the public service

Policy details

This policy would reduce the number of staff in Victoria’s government departments and agencies, focusing on back-office roles, through a 10-year hiring freeze and natural attrition. (Source) It claims savings of about $2.2 billion a year on average, compared with about $1.25 billion a year estimated by the Silver Review, an independent review of Victoria’s public service, which the government has partly committed to acting on. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œBlanket staffing cuts conflict with my service and workforce priorities. Administrative staff can protect frontline workers’ time; my education policy explicitly recognises this.

Historically in Australia, cutting the Public Service has led to a considerably more expensive shadow workforce of consultants. Government work does not disappear when administrative staff are cut. High-end consulting contracts have typically been three times more expensive when compared to retaining public service in-house capacity. There have also been recent documented misuse scandals in big four firms.ā€

Support
Strongly oppose
Policy

Budget management

Increase taxes on gambling, including pokies, online betting and casinos

Policy details

This policy would require gambling businesses to pay more tax on revenue from online betting, poker machines and casino games in Victoria. These activities are taxed separately, so implementing the policy would involve changes to several tax rates. (Source) Current gambling tax revenue is forecast at $2.9 billion in 2026–27. (Source) This policy would also end the arrangement that directs half of Victoria’s wagering and betting tax revenue to the racing industry, keeping that money in the state budget instead. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œConsistent with prevention and public money serving public benefit. Tax design should reduce harm and avoid making essential services dependent on continued gambling losses. Ending the automatic racing allocation would require an explicit new commitment from me which I would support.ā€

Support
Somewhat support
Policy

Budget management

Scale back the Suburban Rail Loop

Policy details

This policy would reduce the scope of Suburban Rail Loop (SRL), while continuing to build the underground rail line between Cheltenham and Box Hill. (Source) Underground connections to existing stations at Box Hill and Glen Waverley would be replaced by surface transfers, alongside cuts to pedestrian bridges, a second entrance at Clayton and some parking and precinct works. (Source) This policy is targeting $2 billion in total savings: approximately $1 billion from these changes and a further $1 billion to be identified through an independent technical review.

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œIndependent technical and financial scrutiny is essential in this project, which has been evaluated by many transport experts to not represent a positive return on investment. Removing connections, entrances and pedestrian infrastructure before demonstrating the consequences should not occur without adequate review. I would support an independent review and require evidence before endorsing this particular package of cuts. Other suggested engineering compromises that should be considered are shorter trains and platforms. Melbourne does need to fix its radial CBD hub and spoke transport layout. Experts agree that the SRL model has great potential to pull jobs out of the city, closer to workers in locations such as Monash, Box Hill, and Cheltenham.ā€

Support
Somewhat support
Policy

Housing

Build 80,000 new social housing dwellings over the next decade

Policy details

This policy would build 80,000 new public and community homes in Victoria over ten years, (Source) with interim milestones to track progress, (Source) through steady direct investment in public housing and grants to community housing organisations. It aims to lift social housing from 3% of Victoria’s housing stock, the lowest share of any state or territory, (Source) to the national average of 4.5%. (Source) Social housing includes both public housing (run by government) and community housing (run by not-for-profits). (Source) (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI strongly support building 80,000 additional social homes across Victoria over the next decade. That should be a minimum. I’d push for a more ambitious public housing program, closer to the share of new homes Victoria built as public housing in the decades after the war.

The statewide target should count net additions after demolitions and sales, include a substantial share of publicly owned housing, and keep the homes affordable for the long term. I’d push for clear delivery milestones and annual reporting so Victorians can see how many homes have been added.

My separate commitment is to work towards 15% of new homes in Ivanhoe being public housing over the next parliamentary term. Building more secure, affordable homes close to shops, schools, services, and public transport would give more people a stable place to live and ease pressure on the private rental market.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Housing

Replace upfront stamp duty on residential properties with a yearly land tax

Policy details

This policy would gradually phase out upfront stamp duty on homes and replace it with a yearly land tax on all residential properties, based on the value of the land. Under this policy, land tax would likely also apply to the home people live in, which is currently exempt. (Source) Infrastructure Victoria recommends making this change using a long-term approach ā€œto avoid disruptions to government revenue and the housing marketā€. (Source) Victoria is already switching commercial and industrial properties from stamp duty to a land tax over ten years. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œMichelle's policy priorities state that she supports ā€˜replacing stamp duty with an annual tax based on unimproved land value, reducing the upfront cost of moving home and spreading tax payments over time.ā€™ā€ (Source)

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Housing

Cap yearly rent increases at the rate of inflation

Policy details

This policy would cap yearly rent increases at the rate of inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index. The cap would apply to the property rather than the tenancy, so landlords could not evict a tenant to reset the rent at a higher level. (Source) The ACT is the only Australian jurisdiction with a similar policy, where landlords need the tenant’s written agreement or tribunal approval for rent increases that exceed Canberra’s rental inflation rate by more than 10%. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œPredictable rents and protection against displacement fits my policy principles related to addressing cost of living and with a focus on those least able to afford sudden rent hikes. Before adopting the specific cap, I would need to settle the treatment of substantial improvements, enforcement and monitoring of rental supply and maintenance.ā€

Support
Somewhat support
Policy

Housing

Raise the foreign purchaser duty on residential property

Policy details

This policy would raise the foreign purchaser additional duty above its current rate of 8%. (Source) Foreign buyers would pay this duty on top of normal land transfer duty, on the share of a residential property they buy. (Source) A federal ban stops most foreign buyers from purchasing established homes until 30 June 2029, (Source) so the higher duty would mainly apply to new homes.

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI somewhat oppose raising the foreign purchaser duty on residential property. Before supporting an increase, I’d want evidence that it would make homes more affordable. The effect on new construction matters. If a higher duty makes it harder for new projects to go ahead, it could mean fewer homes to buy or rent.

I support enforcing existing rules against tax evasion and taking action on homes deliberately left vacant for speculation. My housing priorities are to build more public and community housing, make it easier to build more homes near shops, schools, and public transport, and replace upfront residential stamp duty with an annual tax based on land value. I’d judge any proposed duty increase by whether it helps more people find a secure, affordable home.ā€

Support
Somewhat oppose
Policy

Energy

Extend the operating life of coal-fired power stations

Policy details

This policy would involve the state government taking steps to keep one or more of Victoria’s coal-fired power stations generating electricity beyond their planned closure dates, such as through financial support, agreements with operators or changes to regulations. Yallourn is scheduled to close in mid-2028 and Loy Yang A in June 2035, so extending their operating lives would mean changing those plans and arrangements with their operators. (Source)(Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œMy faster and fairer energy transition and 2035 net-zero position point against subsidised coal-fired power station extensions. Reliability requires timely replacement generation, storage, transmission, and demand management, alongside worker assistance to transition to new careers. My strong opposition to this policy stems from it stalling the clean energy transition, locking in higher greenhouse gas emissions as well as being a significantly more costly and unreliable energy solution.

A fair transition also means supporting workers and communities early. Workers should have access to retraining and help finding secure jobs, and communities that have powered Victoria for decades should have a say in what comes next.ā€

Support
Strongly oppose
Policy

Energy

Support households to switch from gas to electric alternatives

Policy details

This policy would use public funding to help incentivise households replace gas appliances for heating, hot water and cooking, with efficient electric alternatives. Support could take the form of rebates, discounts, zero-interest loans or installation assistance, including for rooftop solar, battery storage and emerging plug-in solar and battery technologies. Victoria already offers discounts on heat pumps and cooktops through the Victorian Energy Upgrades program. (Source)(Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI strongly support helping Victorian households switch from gas to efficient electric appliances. As part of a faster, fairer energy transition, I’d prioritise low-income households, renters, and public housing residents. Support should cover the upfront cost of appliances such as heat pumps and induction cooktops, as well as any wiring or switchboard upgrades needed to install them. In rental homes, landlords should be involved so tenants aren’t left to organise or pay for upgrades themselves.

Efficient electric appliances can lower energy bills, and households that disconnect from gas can avoid ongoing gas supply charges. Switching to electric cooking can also improve indoor air quality by removing pollution from gas burners, which can aggravate asthma and other respiratory conditions. As Victoria’s electricity supply gets cleaner, electrification can also cut household emissions.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Energy

Build transmission to connect renewable energy to homes and businesses

Policy details

This policy would build new electricity transmission lines — high-voltage power lines that carry electricity over long distances from wind farms and solar farms to the local networks that supply homes and businesses. (Source) Planned projects include the Western Renewables Link, a proposed 190-kilometre line from near Ararat in western Victoria to Melbourne’s north-west. (Source) This policy aims to connect new renewable energy as coal-fired power stations close, including Yallourn, which EnergyAustralia plans to close in mid-2028. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI strongly support building the transmission lines Victoria needs to connect renewable energy to homes and businesses. Getting the grid ready sooner is central to my plan for a faster, fairer transition to net zero by 2035. A stronger network can draw power from more places when supply is tight, improving reliability and helping put downward pressure on electricity costs.

Good planning starts with listening to landholders, Traditional Owners, and local communities while route options are still open. I’d push for routes that minimise impacts on farms, communities, and the environment, with clear reasons published for the route chosen. Landholders who host transmission infrastructure should receive fair, ongoing compensation.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Energy

Give local communities a share of renewable energy projects

Policy details

This policy would require companies building large wind, solar and battery projects to offer locals a share of the project or its profits. A share of the project means locals own part of it, while profit sharing means locals receive a portion of the project’s earnings. (Source) From July 2027, Victoria will ask companies to consider community co-ownership, but they will not be required to offer it. (Source) (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œMy fairer and faster energy transition policy supports continuing benefits for host communities. A mandatory ownership or profit-sharing offer is a more specific commitment. Benefits should also reach residents unable to invest their own money.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Education

Cap government funding for private schools at the established standard

Policy details

This policy would cap total public funding for each Victorian private school at 100% of its Schooling Resource Standard (SRS), the estimate of how much funding a school needs to meet its students’ needs. (Source) On average, Victoria’s private schools are funded slightly above their SRS (about 102.5% in 2023), while Victoria’s public schools are funded below it (about 90%). (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI strongly support capping government funding for private schools at their assessed entitlement under the Schooling Resource Standard. This is consistent with my commitment to fair, needs-based funding for every Victorian school. The cap should apply to combined state and Commonwealth funding for each school, taking into account its assessed capacity to contribute privately and the additional funding its students need.

I’d work with the Commonwealth to bring schools receiving more than their entitlement into line on a clear, published timetable, so students’ education isn’t disrupted by abrupt funding changes. The same reform should close funding gaps for schools receiving less than their entitlement, so they have the resources their students need.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Education

Expand government-run childcare centres in regional and high-need areas

Policy details

This policy would open more government-run childcare centres, mainly in regional and high-need areas. It would build on Early Learning Victoria, the government’s existing childcare provider, which is already building 50 centres that offer kinder and long day care in one place. (Source) It aims to help families in ā€œchildcare desertsā€, where more than three children compete for every childcare place. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI strongly support expanding government-run childcare in regional communities and areas where families struggle to find an affordable place. Every child should have access to quality early learning and get support early if they need it. Families should be able to find care close to home, with hours that help them balance work and caring responsibilities.

I’d prioritise communities with the biggest gaps in childcare and make sure new centres are affordable and accessible, including for children with disability or additional needs. Expansion must go hand in hand with support for early childhood educators through fair pay, secure jobs, training, and enough staff to give each child the attention they need.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Education

Establish 10 technical colleges to train secondary students in trades

Policy details

This policy would establish 10 full-time technical colleges, each training up to 500 students in Years 10 to 12 in trades such as plumbing, electrical and carpentry, as well as healthcare and hospitality. (Source) The colleges would sit on existing secondary school and TAFE sites and, like South Australia’s technical colleges, (Source) partner with local industry to create pathways into apprenticeships.

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI support strong vocational education pathways. The number and institutional model are new. Consequently, I would require evidence that these colleges add opportunity for more hands-on learning and prepare students for apprenticeships or traineeships; and complement existing schools, VM, VET and TAFE rather than draw resources away from them or create a second class system. I would also need to see how the new institutions would be staffed given the scarcity of qualified VET trainers.ā€

Support
Somewhat support
Policy

Education

Fully fund public schools to the established standard

Policy details

This policy would ensure Victorian government schools are funded to 100% of the Schooling Resource Standard (SRS), the estimate of how much funding a school needs to meet its students’ needs. (Source) Under an agreement between the Victorian and Australian governments, Victoria is lifting its share from about 70% to 75% of the SRS, and the Australian Government from 20% to 25%, so full funding will be achieved by 2034. (Source) (Source) Principals say schools currently rely on voluntary parent contributions to help fill the funding gap. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI strongly support fully funding Victoria’s public schools by the end of 2028, my Candidate website ( (Source) ) has had this commitment on it from the start.

I’ll work with the Victorian and Commonwealth governments to bring every public primary and secondary school to 100 per cent of its Schooling Resource Standard, the needs-based benchmark for school funding recommended by the Gonski review.

That funding must reach classrooms and follow student needs. It should give schools the teachers, support staff, and resources to help every student learn, including students who need extra support. I’ll push for a published funding timetable and annual progress reports so families and school communities can see whether governments are on track.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Community Safety

Toughen bail laws for serious and repeat offending

Policy details

This policy would make it harder for people accused of serious offences or repeat offending to receive bail. (Source) Victoria tightened its bail laws in March 2025, applying stricter bail tests to more serious offences and to people who reoffend while on bail. (Source) Further proposed changes include a ā€œone-strikeā€ rule requiring bail refusal for repeat offending, stronger penalties for breaching bail and extending breach-of-bail offences to children.

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI somewhat oppose the proposal to toughen bail laws for serious and repeat offending. Victim safety must be central to bail decisions. I support refusing bail when a person poses an unacceptable risk that bail conditions cannot adequately manage. Where the risk can be managed, I support clear, enforceable conditions tailored to the case. Before backing automatic bail refusals or making breaches of bail conditions a criminal offence for children, I’d want clear evidence that those changes would make people safer.

Keeping people safe also means preventing offending in the first place. That’s why my policies prioritise secure, affordable housing, support for families under financial pressure, school and vocational pathways that keep young people engaged, accessible mental health care, and early support for children affected by family violence or trauma. Most young people facing hardship never offend. Providing help early can reduce the risk of offending and give young people a better chance to stay connected to school, family, and community.ā€

Support
Strongly oppose
Policy

Community Safety

Increase investment in early intervention programs for vulnerable young people

Policy details

This policy would increase state funding for early intervention programs, such as mentoring, family support and help to reconnect with school, work and community, with the aim to keep young people out of the youth justice system. As the Auditor-General found no evidence that Victoria’s existing Youth Crime Prevention Program reduces offending, (Source) this policy would also focus on measurable targets and improving data.

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI strongly support School connection, mental health support, and coordinated family services. I strongly support funding programs with measurable outcomes and independent evaluation - Prevention should demonstrate results.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Community Safety

Increase funding to prevent and respond to family, domestic and sexual violence

Policy details

This policy would increase state funding both to prevent family, domestic and sexual violence, through early intervention and prevention work, and to respond to it, through frontline services such as crisis response, case management, counselling and refuges. Victoria Police recorded 102,830 family violence incidents in the year to June 2026, (Source) and made a record 16,500 family violence arrests. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI strongly support increasing funding for frontline family, domestic and sexual violence services. Services need stable, long-term funding so people can get help when they need it, including crisis care, safe accommodation, counselling and specialist support.

Help must be accessible to people with disability, people who need an interpreter and others who face barriers to getting support. My policy also recognises that people fleeing violence often need help beyond the immediate crisis. I’d push for ongoing support for adults and children, including help with finances and finding secure, long-term housing, so they can rebuild their lives safely.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Community Safety

Expand police stop-and-search powers to seize weapons in public spaces

Policy details

This policy, known as ā€œJack’s Lawā€, would allow police to scan anyone in a public place for knives and other metal weapons with a handheld metal detector, without a warrant or suspicion. (Source) Police can currently do this only inside formally declared ā€œdesignated areasā€, such as shopping centres or train stations. (Source) This policy would remove the need to declare an area first. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI somewhat oppose expanding police stop-and-search powers in public spaces. People should feel safe in public, and police need effective tools to seize weapons and prevent violence. Before giving police broader powers to search people, I’d want clear evidence that the change would reduce weapon-related harm and that more targeted measures couldn’t achieve the same result.

Any expansion should be limited to what’s necessary, with clear rules on when searches can occur, independent oversight and public reporting on who is searched, how often weapons are found and whether violence falls. I also support investing in early intervention, including helping young people stay connected to school, access mental health care and get family support before problems escalate.ā€

Support
Somewhat oppose
Policy

Health

Open 10 free public dental clinics

Policy details

This policy would open 10 free, walk-in public dental clinics across Victoria — seven in Melbourne and three in regional areas — from July 2027. (Source) The clinics would provide free check-ups and treatment such as fillings, root canals and extractions, prioritising people with the most urgent needs, and could treat more than 100,000 people a year. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI strongly support opening ten free public dental clinics for Victorians who can least afford care. Cost can force people to put off check-ups or treatment until they’re in severe pain. The clinics should provide routine check-ups, emergency care and treatments such as root canals where clinically appropriate, so people can get help early and keep their teeth.

I’d support straightforward means testing and locate the clinics where unmet need is greatest. To make all ten clinics work, Victoria needs a funded plan to recruit and retain dentists, oral health therapists and dental assistants. I’d also publish wait times for routine and urgent care so Victorians can see whether the clinics are improving access.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Health

Build more discharge lounges to ease ambulance ramping

Policy details

This policy would create a fund to build or expand up to 10 discharge lounges in Victorian hospitals, starting with those experiencing the worst overcrowding and ambulance ramping. (Source) In a discharge lounge, patients ready to go home can wait for medication, transport or paperwork, which frees their ward bed for a new patient. (Source) This aims to move patients out of emergency departments faster, so paramedics spend less time waiting outside hospitals. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œHospital discharge lounges for patients who are post-acute and awaiting discharge medications are a good idea to reduce bed-block and Emergency Department ramping. Strict inclusion criteria for patients would be required however to ensure that only medically stable and ambulant people used them.ā€

Support
Somewhat support
Policy

Health

Increase funding for community health services

Policy details

Community health services are local services funded by the Victorian Government to provide allied health, counselling and nursing care, with a focus on groups such as children and people with chronic disease. (Source) This policy would increase the government’s core funding for community health services and bush nursing centres, so they can offer more prevention, early detection and care close to where people live. (Source) Over time, this aims to reduce demand for more complex and costly care in hospitals and emergency departments. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI strongly support increased funding for Community Health Services and preventive health initiatives generally. My health policy prioritises increasing multi-disciplinary health care clinics including Community Health Services. Increasing preventive health initiatives from the tiny 2% of the health budget will result in significant long term health savings, by preventing downstream acute and much more expensive hospital admissions. It should also contribute towards improved quality and even length of life for locals.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Health

Fund private hospitals to perform more elective surgery for public patients

Policy details

Based on Queensland’s Surgery Connect program, (Source) this policy would let public patients choose to have elective surgery at a private hospital at no cost, through four-year contracts with private hospitals that have spare capacity. (Source) It would cover common procedures such as hip and knee replacements, cataract surgery and colonoscopies, and aims to halve the waiting list by delivering an extra 25,000 surgeries a year.

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œExperts such as the Grattan institute have maintained that there is no evidence that expanding the capacity of private hospitals to perform elective surgery on public patients achieves reductions in public hospital waiting lists. Private hospitals are often less efficient at providing care for certain cases, resulting in longer stay and unnecessary care. Additionally, there can be the perverse incentive in market based care to ā€˜cherry-pick- the most profitable procedures, leaving the more expensive/difficult care to be provided by the public system.ā€

Support
Somewhat oppose
Policy

Climate

Establish a climate disaster recovery fund

Policy details

This policy would create an ongoing Victorian fund to pay for clean-up, repairs to community infrastructure and local recovery services after climate disasters such as bushfires, floods and storms. Victoria already shares eligible recovery costs with the Commonwealth, (Source) but this policy would add a dedicated state fund for any disaster.

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI strongly support establishing a Victorian Climate Disaster Recovery Fund. After floods and bushfires, households and communities can face years of rebuilding costs. Setting money aside now is responsible budgeting. It would give communities a more reliable source of help to repair essential infrastructure and rebuild in ways that reduce the damage from future disasters.

I’d examine a levy on fossil fuel producers to help finance the fund, consistent with my policy that the costs of fossil fuels should be reflected in their price. Before settling the design, I’d want a clear assessment of what Victoria can implement and how much of the levy could be passed on to households. I’d also require clear eligibility rules and public reporting on where the money goes and what it delivers.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Climate

Strengthen regulations to reduce land clearing on private land

Policy details

This policy would tighten restrictions on removing native vegetation from privately owned land. Victoria already requires a council planning permit to remove native vegetation unless an exemption applies, so the change would strengthen existing controls. (Source) It would also provide dedicated state funding for councils to monitor clearing and enforce the rules, potentially using satellite and aerial imagery, as recommended by the Auditor-General. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI somewhat oppose a broad tightening of land-clearing rules on private land. Protecting native vegetation helps wildlife move between habitats, protects soil and waterways, and keeps carbon stored. We also need to respect landholders’ ability to manage their properties and keep farms productive.

My preference is to enforce existing protections and offer practical incentives, such as paying farmers to protect remnant vegetation or restore habitat along waterways. That would the public benefits farmers deliver through good land stewardship. Where evidence shows those measures leave significant habitat at risk, I’d consider targeted changes developed with landholders and assessed for their impact on biodiversity and farm viability.ā€

Support
Somewhat oppose
Policy

Climate

Legislate a duty of care to protect young people and future generations from climate harm

Policy details

This policy would create a legal duty for Victorian decision-makers to prioritise the health and wellbeing of young people and future generations when assessing coal, oil and gas projects. They would have to assess how a project’s contribution to climate change could harm young people. (Source) Victoria’s Climate Change Act already requires the Minister to consider climate change when deciding whether to approve onshore oil and gas. This policy would add a specific duty focused on children and future generations. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI strongly support legislating a duty of care to protect young people and future generations from climate harm. When the Victorian Government makes major decisions, it should assess the long-term consequences, listen to young people and publish how it considered climate risks and what it will do to reduce them. That would give Victorians a clear basis for holding governments to account beyond a single parliamentary term.

This duty would reinforce my plan for a faster, fairer transition to net zero by 2035 and for better preparation for floods, bushfires and extreme heat. Young Victorians will live with the consequences of decisions made today. They deserve a voice in those decisions, and a clear explanation of how their interests were weighed.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Climate

Increase funding and resources for the Country Fire Authority

Policy details

This policy would increase state funding and resources for the Country Fire Authority (CFA), whose volunteer brigades respond to fires and other emergencies across much of rural and regional Victoria. (Source) Additional funding could replace ageing fire trucks, upgrade stations and protective equipment, and provide training and support to recruit and retain volunteers. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI strongly support increasing funding and resources for the Country Fire Authority. Volunteer firefighters need modern trucks, safe equipment and the training to use them. I’d prioritise replacing ageing trucks that pose the greatest safety risks and work with local brigades to identify where equipment and volunteer recruitment and retention need the most support.

This is part of preparing Victoria for bushfires and protecting the people who respond to them. I’d require independent audits of the additional spending and publish the results so Victorians can see which trucks and equipment have been replaced, whether safety risks have been addressed and whether brigades are better equipped to respond.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Transport

Cap tolls at $30 a week for one year

Policy details

This policy would cap weekly toll costs at $30 for cars, motorbikes and light commercial vehicles on CityLink, EastLink and the West Gate Tunnel throughout 2027. (Source) Motorists would keep paying tolls as usual, then claim back what they paid above $30 a week through a quarterly Service Victoria rebate, up to $350 a week or $5,000 a year per vehicle.

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI somewhat support capping tolls at $30 a week for one year. It could ease cost-of-living pressure for people who need to drive regularly, particularly in outer suburbs where public transport may be limited.

Before backing the cap, I’d want the government to publish what it would cost to cover tolls above $30, how it would fund that cost and what effect it expects on congestion. A cheaper toll could encourage more driving, and the subsidy could add to state debt or divert money from public transport.

My longer-term priority is affordable transport. I’d push for a funded plan to keep public transport fares affordable, improve the frequency and reliability of connections, and subject toll pricing and contracts to independent scrutiny. People who need to drive deserve fair tolls, and more households should have a practical alternative.ā€

Support
Somewhat support
Policy

Transport

Spend 5% of the transport budget on safe, connected bike paths

Policy details

This policy would dedicate 5% of the state transport budget to planning and building safe, separated cycling routes across Melbourne and regional centres. (Source) This 5% would be new funding, on top of existing walking and cycling funding and bike paths already built through major road and level crossing projects.

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI strongly support allocating 5 per cent of Victoria’s transport budget to safe, connected bike paths. Many people would ride for everyday trips if they had a safe route the whole way. I’d prioritise closing gaps in the network, making intersections safer and separating cyclists from motor traffic and pedestrians where possible, even where that means reallocating road space.

A connected network would make it easier to ride to schools, shops, workplaces and train stations. When more people can choose to cycle for short trips, it can ease congestion, cut transport emissions and help people stay active. Those are benefits I’d count when assessing value for money. I’d publish where the money goes and track whether the investment closes aps, safety and gets more people riding.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Transport

Spend at least $3 billion a year maintaining state roads

Policy details

This policy would guarantee at least $3 billion a year to maintain state-managed roads. The Department of Transport estimated this is the amount needed to stop roads getting worse while replacing ageing assets. (Source) This is nearly three times the $1.04 billion budgeted for 2026–27, (Source) and more than double the $1.39 billion total, once an extra $352 million for pothole repairs is included. (Source) 82% of state roads are in regional Victoria, which also have the highest proportion of roads as being in poor or very poor condition. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI strongly support spending at least $3 billion a year maintaining Victoria’s state roads. Too often, repairs happen after potholes have become dangerous. I’d prioritise preventive maintenance in metropolitan and regional Victoria, including resurfacing worn roads and improving drainage before damage gets worse. Roads exposed to heavy freight and extreme weather need particular attention.

I’d make this funding part of a long-term transport plan, with priorities based on road condition, safety risk and the cost of delaying repairs. I’d publish where the money goes and track road condition, repair times and recurring defects so Victorians can see whether the investment is making roads safer and keeping them in better condition.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Transport

Improve frequency and connections across all Victorian public transport systems

Policy details

This policy would run buses, trains and trams more often across Victoria and make it easier to change between them. Examples include metro trains at least every 20 minutes until midnight and key cross-suburban buses every 20 minutes, (Source) with upgrades to busy interchange stations such as Caulfield and Richmond. (Source) It would also align bus timetables with train and tram timetables so passengers wait less when they change services. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œThere is ample evidence from public transit systems all over the world, that increasing frequency of PT to transform the journey from ā€˜plan your journey’ to ā€˜turn up and go’, massively increases use, reducing car dependency and the associated vehicular traffic congestion. I would strongly advocate for more services to both the middle and outer suburbs of Melbourne, improving transport equity.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Other policies

Pause new AI data centres until protections are in place

Policy details

This policy would temporarily pause approvals and construction of new AI data centres in Victoria until stronger, enforceable safeguards are in place for electricity and water use, the environment, and nearby communities. It aims to give communities time to weigh the risks and benefits, (Source) and give councils and residents a say on future projects. (Source) Victoria’s new planning rules are not yet legally binding, and only cover applications lodged from 23 September 2026, not the state’s 50 existing data centres. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI support pausing approvals for new AI data centres until Victoria has enforceable protections in place. Well-sited projects can bring investment and jobs and help keep sensitive data in Australia. They should go ahead where they can meet clear conditions that protect nearby residents, protect our resources, and keep infrastructure costs off household bills.

Under my Fairer and Faster Energy Transition policy, developers would have to fund new renewable generation equal to at least 150 per cent of the centre’s projected annual electricity use, with enough storage and other backup capacity to match its demand around the clock. They’d also have to fund new desalinated water supplies, use battery backup instead of fossil fuel generators and pay for the grid upgrades their projects require.

Local residents should have a say while siting options are still open. I’d require public reporting on energy and water use and enforceable limits on noise and other local impacts. Once those safeguards are in place, projects that meet them should be able to proceed.ā€

Support
Somewhat support
Policy

Other policies

Repeal the Treaty legislation and the First Peoples' Assembly

Policy details

Victoria became the first Australian state to legislate a Treaty with First Peoples in 2025, establishing Gellung Warl, which includes the elected First Peoples’ Assembly. (Source) The Treaty was developed over nearly a decade of extensive community consultation, including elections for the First Peoples' Assembly. Negotiations between the Assembly and the government that were held across Victoria so communities could take part. (Source)(Source) Gellung Warl cannot make or veto laws, but can question ministers and must receive a treaty compatibility statement with every bill. (Source) This policy would repeal that legislation and abolish those bodies.

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI strongly oppose repealing Victoria’s Treaty legislation or abolishing the First Peoples’ Assembly. I support First Peoples’ sovereignty and right to self-determination. The Assembly gives First Peoples in Victoria a representative voice in decisions that affect their communities, and the Treaty provides a way to negotiate directly with government.

I also support protecting truth-telling so First Peoples can share their experiences in their own words, and all Victorians can better understand our shared history and its ongoing effects. The Victorian Government should report publicly on the commitments it makes through Treaty, what it has delivered and where more work is needed.ā€

Support
Strongly oppose
Policy

Other policies

Provide free abortion care

Policy details

This policy would remove out-of-pocket costs for medication and surgical abortions before 16 weeks of pregnancy by paying participating private providers to deliver the care. Currently, most abortions in Victoria are provided privately, where patients may pay fees even after Medicare rebates. (Source) This policy would also include travel assistance for eligible patients who need to travel long distances for care. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œI strongly support providing free abortion care up to 16 weeks of pregnancy. Abortion is essential healthcare. Cost should never force someone to delay care or put it out of reach.

This fits my broader health policy of making timely care easier to access close to home. I’d work to make free abortion care available across Victoria, including in regional communities, with clear referral pathways so people can get confidential care without unnecessary delays.ā€

Support
Strongly support
Policy

Other policies

Give workers a legal right to work from home two days a week

Policy details

This policy would give eligible Victorian employees a legal right to work from home two days a week where reasonable, with a proportionate entitlement for part-time and regular casual employees. (Source) Employers could refuse on specified grounds, such as duties requiring attendance, significant productivity or safety impacts, or excessive costs, and would have to explain their reasons. (Source) Employees could challenge a refusal through the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission and, if unresolved, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. (Source) On 10 September 2026, the Legislative Council voted to send the bill to a parliamentary committee, so it is not yet law. (Source)

Evidence

Response to Build a Ballot Vic 2026: ā€œSupport for enshrining work from home entitlements (two days per week) makes common sense, addresses cost of living issues, reduces traffic congestion, reduces traffic emissions, and increases workforce participation. It's now much more practical for employers too - worker performance can be just as easily tracked remotely. There are strong benefits for the employee including better work-life balance and no drop in productivity. The risks of reduced collaboration and mentoring from co-workers is well managed by having three days of worksite contact.ā€

Support
Strongly support